In these slides the terms inner product is used in the same fashion as the dot product, but as I understand it the inner product is defined a generalized form of the dot product. Should we be concerned by this distinction?
sank
Would something similar to cross-correlation be a way of defining inner products for functions?
In these slides the terms inner product is used in the same fashion as the dot product, but as I understand it the inner product is defined a generalized form of the dot product. Should we be concerned by this distinction?
Would something similar to cross-correlation be a way of defining inner products for functions?