Why does long & skinny might be "more efficient"?
@EdCat See this slide: even though the triangles here are long and skinny, we get a good approximation of the cylindrical part of the surface using a very small number of triangles.
Why does long & skinny might be "more efficient"?
@EdCat See this slide: even though the triangles here are long and skinny, we get a good approximation of the cylindrical part of the surface using a very small number of triangles.