Pentagon inequality? Really?
How does the diagram look like a pentagon? I don't see it at all. Are we implicitly breaking up the vectors into smaller subcomponents or something?
(Edit: I didn't see the 2nd-to-last slide before asking this :/)
Caught me zoning out for a second before I snapped back with the "pentagon inequality."
I've always heard the final property be referred to as the triangle inequality, and never heard of the pentagon inequality - is it a graphics specific thing to call it the pentagon inequality?
Pentagon inequality, a nice trick for checking whether we are focusing lol
Guess we are using a coordinate system where 5 equals to 3 here :)
Since these slides have been used for several years, I assume these "mistakes", along with the one on slide 14, will continue to appear in the future to check we actually listened to the lecture?
How is this triangle a pentagon lol